Organizational Behavior Similarities Between Humans and Elephants Essay

Organizational Behavior Similarities Between Humans and Elephants - Essay Example Among their unique characteristics are having a long and flexible snout (proboscis), elongated incisor teeth (tusk) and a placenta just like humans. They have other distinguishing features which are not very obvious such as obscure features in their teeth, shoulders and ankles; they are one of the very few hoof mammals to have retained five toes (other mammals have only four or fewer toes). Discussion Elephants exhibit a remarkable high level of intelligence; this makes up for their very slow gaits which usually has an adverse effect on wild animals because slow-moving animals are at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to escaping their predators. Their big size is a big help in their fight for survival since they have very few enemies in the wild; however, there is another characteristic of elephants which is their complex level of organizational behaviors. It is this social behavior which has allowed them to outlive other species in the wild as it makes them highly organized in t erms of foraging for food, looking for water sources and in fighting off predators; elephants also learn throughout their lifetimes (Haynes 64). Elephants are highly-socialized animals. They live in groups, tend to stay with their relatives, form into familial and kin groupings similar to human clans, highly gregarious and in general associate with other members of their herd. The social behavior of the elephants is very complex because they live very long lives (ibid.) and elephants are suspected to use the same type of personal individual identification as humans when they communicate with each other. They largely maintain long-term relationships; elephant groups are female-centered. By using infrasonic (low-frequency) calls, elephants can communicate with all the other group members and identify an elephant’s individual identity (Breed & Moore 196). The elephants are also very adaptive in their behaviors, with females influencing the males (Wasser 30). Social System of Ele phants – their social system is hierarchical and matriarchal. It is usually the oldest female elephant that is the recognized leader of the group. The rest of the group members follow their matriarch in search of food and water to areas which are recalled by the matriarch’s memory bank. Studies showed that elephant groups without a matriarch are often very tentative in which direction to go because no one gives the order (Dagg 32). An elephant herd needs a large territory because it has an inefficient digestive tract, able to digest and absorb only half the food an elephant eats (O’Connell 235) and needs a big grazing area. The study of elephant behavior will have a great bearing on efforts to ensure their survival. The herd behavior of elephants exhibit striking similarities to human behavior in the social organization sphere. There is an acknowledged leader in a group and this is the oldest female elephant (matriarch) but other female members (sisters, aunts, nieces, cousins, etc.) take a collective effort in caring for their young. It is the matriarch, together with the several generations of relatives, who will gather the group into a close-knit unit that will suddenly take a charge and stampede a perceived threat (AWF 1). Elephants use a variety of ways to communicate such as by sound, smell and stamping the ground (Waal & Tyack 79). Stress Conditions – elephants are very similar to human beings in many ways. One

Drinks that Influenced History and Civilization Essay Example for Free

Drinks that Influenced History and Civilization Essay The author describes the origin of six drinks that greatly influenced history and civilization around the world: beer, wine, spirits, coffee, tea, and cola. He explains how each drink was the defining drink during a historical period from antiquity to present day. The fluids are vital because each had a role of shaping the modern world. They have been used as currencies, in religious rites, as a political symbol, sources of philosophical and artistic inspiration. Some have served to highlight the power of the elite, and appease the downtrodden. They connected world cultures by impacting trade, economy, religion, and politics. Beer was discovered through different methods of cooking and storing cereal grains. When the ice age ended, lands such as the Fertile Crescent provided abundant cereal grains. Such grains provided a reliable source of food, and the ability to store cereal grains began to encourage people to stay in one place. This resulted in permanent settlements as societies transitioned from hunting and gathering to farming. Although the residents of such villages continued to hunt, skeletal evidence suggests that they subsisted mostly on plant-based diets. Beer was shared, and it was symbol of hospitality and friendship. To Neolithic drinkers, beer’s ability to intoxicate and ferment seemed magical, and it was concluded that it was a gift from the gods. Beer-drinking cultures tell stories and myths of how it was discovered. Mesopotamians and Egyptians saw beer as an ancient, god-given drink that supported their existence, formed part of their cultural and religious identity, and had great social importance. It was consumed by anyone regardless of status, age, or gender. Beer impacted the growth and diffusion of the earliest civilizations greatly. The emergence of complex societies, the need to keep written records, and the popularity of beer all followed from the surplus of grain. It was also used as a form of currency and payment. Beer also had a direct link to health. Mesopotamians and Egyptians used it medicinally. The Egyptians used bread and beer in funerals. Without the discovery of beer, the earliest civilizations of Southwest Asia and Egypt would not have been as prosperous.

Raymond Carvers Cathedral Essay -- essays research papers fc

In "The Compartment," one of Raymond Carver's bleakest stories, a man passes through the French countryside in a train, en route to a rendevous with a son he has not seen for many years. "Now and then," the narrator says of the man, "Meyers saw a farmhouse and its outbuildings, everything surrounded by a wall. He thought this might be a good way to live-in an old house surrounded by a wall" (Cathedral 48). Due to a last minute change of heart, however, Meyers chooses to stay insulated in his "compartment" and, remaining on the train, reneges on his promise to the boy, walling out everything external to his selfish world, paternal obligation included. Meyers's tendency toward insularity is not, of course, unique among the characters in Cathedral or among the characters of earlier volumes. In Will You Be Quiet, Please? there is the paranoid self-cloistering of Slater and Arnold Breit, and in What We Talk About When We Talk About Love we read of James Packer's cantankerous,self-absorbed disgruntlement about life's injustices. In Cathedral appear other, more extreme versions of insularity,from a husband's self-imposed confinement to a living room in "Preservation" to another's pathetic reluctance to leave an attic garret in "Careful." More strikingly in Cathedral than before, Carver's figures seal themselves off from their worlds, walling out the threatening forces in their lives even as they wall themselves in, retreating destructively into the claustrophobic inner enclosures of self. But corresponding to this new extreme of insularity, there are in several stories equally striking instances where--pushing insularity the other way--characters attempt to throw off their entrapping nets and, in a few instances, appear to succeed. In Cathedral, and in Cathedral only, we witness the rare moments of their comings out, a process of openi ng up in closed-down lives that comes across in both the subjects and events of the stories and in the process of their telling, where self-disenfranchisement is reflected even on the level of discourse, rhetorically or structurally, or both. As one might expect, "de-insulation" of this kind necessarily involves the intervention of others: the coming out of a self-enclosed figure depends upon the influence of another being--a baker or a babysitter or blind man, o... ...alk About When We Talk About Love. New York: Random House, 1981. --. Where I'm Calling From. 1st edition. Franklin Center, PA: Franklin Library, 1988. --. Will You Be Quiet. Please? New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977. Howe, Irving. "Stories of Our Loneliness." New York Times Book Review. 11 Sep 1983: 42-43. Lonnquist, Barbara C. "Narrative Displacement and Literary Faith: Raymond Carver's Inheritance from Flannery O'Connor." Since Flannery O'Connor: Essays on the Contemporary American Short Story. Ed. Loren Logsdon and Charles W. Mayer. Macomb, IL: Western Illinois University, 1987. 142-50. Saltzman, Arthur. Understanding Raymond Carver. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 1988. Skenazy, Paul. "Life in Limbo: Raymond Carver's Fiction." Enclitic 11(0000): 00-00. Stull, William. "Beyond Hopelessville: Another Side of Raymond Carver." Philological Quarterly 64 (1985): 1-15. Verley, Claudine. "Narration and Interiority in Raymond Carver's 'Where I'm Calling From.'" Journal of the Short Story in English 13 (1989): 91-102. Weele, Michael Vander. "Raymond Carver and the Language of Desire." Denver Quarterly 22 (1987): 00-000.

“Goodbye to all that” By Robert Graves Essay

In 1929, Robert Graves published his war novel â€Å"Goodbye to all that.† It is based on his own life experiences of the Great War. This autobiography has been involved in â€Å"The great books controversy and changing attitudes towards the war.† But in 1931, two years after this Great War book was published, Robert Graves wrote â€Å"P. S. Goodbye to all that.† In this he justifies some of his actions and why he wrote parts of the novel the way he did. He confesses that he wrote the novel to make â€Å"a lump of money† he also included the â€Å"ingredients† of a popular memoir, some of them including † people like reading about food and drink.murders.ghosts.kings and other peoples mothers.† These ingredients make a good read in a novel and it’s the type of things that people enjoy reading about. It also breaks up the novel and it doesn’t concentrate on war so much. He also apologises to the people he offended in the nove l. Autobiographies were a chronicle of someone’s life laid down for posterity usually at the request of family members. â€Å"Goodbye to all that† differs by virtue of his stated purpose in writing it. But throughout the novel there are passages that defy a lot of what he said. An example of this great writing is in chapter 15, which shows the very â€Å"matter of fact† attitudes. â€Å"The other day.a bomb dropped next door and killed 3 soldiers who were billeted there, a woman and a child.† This probably did happen but it was one of the many horrors of war which soldiers experienced day in and day out. It became part of their lives; many lost hope and resorted to committing suicide. Robert Graves clearly states that the first person he saw dead and the last person he saw dead before he left the war were both suicide victims. This just goes to show the kind of impact that the war had on people’s lives. Graves talks about it as an everyday occurrence, which to the soldiers at the front line it was. We know for a fact that the fatalities and injuries were for real and were not inaccurate. But there are inaccuracies that can be misleading. For example the murder of the company’s sergeant major. † Did you mistake him for a spy?† The young miner replied, â€Å"No sir, we mistook him for our platoon sergeant† This is quite hu morous but the date of the murder was wrong. A number of things are wrong in the book but they have all been changed to make a good story. It makes it more interesting, and then more people want to read it. The horror of war is made very clear in â€Å"Goodbye to all that.† One section of the novel, Graves tells us about one of their platoon members that has been killed and is laying rigid in the trench and is blocking the pathway. Instead of one of the men moving him, they leave him there and make fun of him every time one of them wanted to pass; they just pushed him out of the way and made some sort of humorous comment. This was just one of the many black humour passages in the book and as readers it makes us laugh. It shows detachment from the war, which makes the story a little more light hearted and more readable and interesting to an outsider. It gives structure to the book. There is another passage in the novel that is humorous but it couldn’t possibly be true. This passage is known as the singing guns. This was when the Germans and the British would communicate through rifle fire and guns. They would sing songs back and fore to each other and have conversations. The soldiers would do this by taking out a few of the bullets, so when the gu n was fired, the blanks would go through and not make a noise. The soldiers would figure out a pattern or tune and continuing to take out blanks, would eventually make a song. On one occasion the message was â€Å"we all German korporals wish you English korporals a good day and invite you to dinner tonight with beer and cakes† This was impossible to do and this was one of the inaccuracies that Sassoon and Blunden didn’t like. Fussell and Sassoon frowned upon these inaccuracies, but they can also be looked upon in a very different way. As Richard Graves points out, â€Å"the fact that Goodbye to all that is full of inaccuracies does not detract from its importance both as a searingly honest autobiography, which tells the truth about how Robert felt about his past in 1929, and as a record of what it was like to be a British soldier during the First World War.† The title of the novel reflects the content Robert Graves is trying to say goodbye to everything to do with the War and Britain. He wrote the novel to unburden himself of the memories of the war as described by his nephew, Richard Graves, â€Å"for the process of healing to re-integration to be complete, only one more thing was necessary: following Riding’s example, he must cast off the whole of his â€Å"historical† existence, and what better way to do that, for an author then to write about it?† He’s also saying goodbye to his school life. Graves behaved like a â€Å"disaffected adolescent† all his life and the tone of â€Å"Goodbye to all that† is reflected in his style of approach in this novel. He was criticised for talking about school by the public school system and old boys. But by writing, he is distancing himself from his past and he wants a new start. But Graves found this detachment very useful in later life especially when he was at war as we see in a letter he wrote to his auntie, â€Å"Dear auntie, this leaves me in the pink. We are at present wading in blood up to our necks. Send me fags and a life belt. This war is a booger.† Thus because of this detachment, he was quite happy to speak openly and discuss all the points in his life that have brought him to today. It is the establishment in general, manifesting itself as the war, public school system and morally righteous parents, not just the war. After Graves wrote â€Å"Goodbye to all that† he left the country for good to live in Majorca. He left the past behind him to start a new life. The memories of war differ from bitterness to happiness when he met his first wife, a nurse in the hospital. This is the first time that he finds himself attracted to a women. He realises that he is heterosexual. While he was at school in Charterhouse he was very unhappy and he turned to another boy for love but this was only because of the false surroundings of the public school. This war had come as a solution to a moment of unease for Graves. He was offered a place at Oxford University but he didn’t go. He had a good education and he was a good sportsman also. His religious beliefs went into doubt, although religion was very important to the rest of his family. Religion only became a problem for Graves after the war was over. He realised that he had no faith anymore and didn’t understand the reason for war. Opinions of certain regiments also played a part in Graves’ novel. Other soldiers criticised it as not being as noble or as war like as others. It was also described as â€Å"froth† when placed against a serious nature of the book as it discusses war in its horror. In the 1929 version of the novel, Graves made the mistake of writing about someone else’ s mother, Sassoon’s mother. He wrote in detail about how one night he stayed there and Sassoon’s mother was trying to contact her dead son. Sassoon took great offence to this, as Graves had not asked his permission to put it in his novel. Also Graves published some of Sassoon’s poetry without permission. Just six days before the book was being published, Sassoon decides that the information published about his mother is too personal and demands that it is taken out. These were more of personal criticisms rather then objective ones. Therefore they should not be used as legitimate criticisms of the autobiography. The reality of war is brought home to us in chapters fifteen and twenty. Chapter 15 is based on the battle of Loos and chapter 20 is based on the battle of the Somme. Both these battles are famous and many lives were lost through both. Graves goes into great detail on both but chapter 15 had an incredible impact on me as a reader. At the beginning of the chapter we see the plan for the attack, but both the soldiers and us know that the plan won’t work. Many men realised that they wouldn’t surv ive the battle but they had to fight. If they didn’t, then their own men would shoot them. They couldn’t go against the orders of the generals, as they were always right. As Thomas says on page 150, † we’ve just got to go over and keep the enemy busy while the folk on our right do the real work.personally, I don’t give a damn either way. We’ll get killed whatever happens.† It is sad that soldiers thought like this. Many men out have rather died then go home to their families because they knew that they couldn’t understand what they had been through. This wasn’t an inaccuracy; this was real life and happened in every platoon. Men had to go over the top knowing they wouldn’t all come back. The soldiers knew themselves that they had little chance of surviving. Many men lost their faith, because they knew there was little logic in what they were going to do, but however, they couldn’t do anything about it. The Germans were also more advanced then the British and French. They had better plans, modern tactics and advanced artillery. In the Battle of Loos the Germans were using, â€Å"five-point-nines† another example of things going wrong was in the same battle. The men were ordered to â€Å"discharge accessories at all costs† but this proved a big mistake, as the wind had changed direction and instead of the gas going across no mans land and into the German trench, it went into no means land and then floated back into the British trench, gassing their own men. The Germans knew of the attack and â€Å"immediately put on their gas-helmets: semi rigid ones, better then ours† It wasn’t only battles that added realism to the novel: the stories that Graves tells about people in his novel, the black humour, the depersonalisation and the detachment all added to this great war book. One example of black humour was when they were advancing on no mans land. The platoon had all gone â€Å"over the top.† He saw the platoon on his left flopping down so he whistled the advance again, but nobody seemed to hear. He jumped up from his shell-hole, waved and signalled â€Å"forward†. Nobody stirred, he shouted, â€Å"you bloody cowards, are you leaving me to go on alone?† His platoon sergeant, groaning with a broken shoulder gasped, â€Å"Not cowards, sir. Willing enough. But they’re all f- dead† The black humour in actual fact covers up the reality of war. Many men went to war to show patriotism, many didn’t realise what they were letting themselves in for. Bravery became another main theme in the novel. The description of Samson is also hard hitting to readers. We feel sympathy and pity towards him. Samson, after going over the top, got hit badly and was laying, groaning about 20 yards beyond the front trenches. He was unable to move. As he was hit, he screamed uncontrollably, but to stop himself, he thrust his own fist into his mouth to stop the screams. While he was stranded, many attempts were made to rescue him, but three men were killed, tow officers and two men injured also. In the end, someone did manage to get out to him, but he waved him back because he said, â€Å"he was riddled through and not worth rescuing.† This was sad, not only for the readers, but it would have been unimaginable to be there and to know that one of your men is out there, alive but dying on no mans land, and there is nothing that u can do. Many men forgot about the dead, simply because it was easier for them to carry on fighting and to forget, otherwise it would have drove them mad, just like it did Sassoon in â€Å"Regeneration† Detachment played a huge part in their lives. They had to forget that they were in the situation and carry on with their duties, â€Å"Every night, we went out to fetch in the dead of the other battalions† The language that Graves uses shows that the men treated death in a very matter of fact way. It was the only way for them to deal with it. I would imagine that many people after reading the book found some understanding of how peo ple typically thought about these events, humorous or not, at the time and afterwards. Propaganda played a huge part in the war, mainly for the people back home, which didn’t really understand what the soldiers were going through at the front line. They didn’t want to know most of the time; they turned a blind eye and carried on with their own lives. They thought that just because the war hadn’t hit Britain just yet, they thought that it had nothing to do with them. Many men, who fought in the war, came home to find that they had changed beyond recognition and couldn’t go back to the lives they led before going to war. Graves also went through this after fighting in the Great War. This is why he left the country after writing the novel. He went to live in Majorca. Graves confesses himself that he wrote the book to make â€Å"a lump of money.† Also as Richard Percival Graves reminds us, it was â€Å"an opportunity for a formal goodbye to you and to you and to you and to me and all that forgetfulness because once all has been settled in my mind and written down it need never be thought about again.† The 1957 prologue had huge success in selling around twenty thousand copies in just five days. Pe ople wanted to know what war was like from someone who had first hand experiences of war. The continuing popularity cannot be because of the errors or falsities as suggested by Sassoon and Blunden but the quality of writing by Graves. The Daily Herald put â€Å"Goodbye to all that† on the front page of the news. It has been praised as â€Å"the most startling war book written yet.† But on the other hand there are many critics who were deeply offended by Graves’ frankness and honesty when describing his experiences. One critic called it â€Å"ungentlemanly and a whole collection of unmitigated tripe† The black humour and humour also make the experiences realistic. â€Å"It began with confirmation.I was looking forward to the ceremony as a spiritual climax. When it came and the Holy Ghost didn’t decend in the form of a dove and I did not find myself gifted with tongues and nothing spectacular happened, except that the boy whom the bishop of Zululand was blessing at the same time as me slipped off the narrow foot stool on which we were both kneeling on.† This is humorous and you could imagine this happening. After reading this great novel, I disagree with Sassoon, Blunden and Fussell. I don’t believe it is a book, â€Å"full of inaccuracies and caricature scenes† I think the book is coherent and an excellent read. People wanted to read about the war and â€Å"the ingredients† also helped to sell the book. This is why the book was and still is so popular to today. I agree with J.M. Cohen when speaking about the novel as â€Å"harshly accurate, it is a direct and factual autobiography.† â€Å"Goodbye to all that† is a personal account of Robert Graves’ experiences of World War 1. It gives us a great insight into the war and I believe â€Å"it is a serious and important war memoir† as described by Richard Graves. Bibliography 1. â€Å"Goodbye to all that† Robert Graves 2. â€Å"The Great War in modern memory† Fussell 3. â€Å"Essay on Robert Graves novel† R.P Graves Total word count 2848

Over-Crowded Classroom and Students Attitude Towards Learning Essay

Table 1. Class by Class Enrolment of Grade 4 pupils of four selected schools. Class Section| Digos CentralElementary School| Rhema King’s KidAcademy| Sta. MariaElementary School| Sta. Cruz Elementary School| A| | | | | B| | | | | C| | | | | D| | | | | Table2. Problems of over-crowded classroom and student-teacher interactions. Please make how much you agree or disagree with each of the following: | StronglyDisagree| Disagree| Agree| StronglyAgree| 5| 1. Noise-making is very rampant during lessons.| | | | | | 2. Securing students total attention during lesson is almost impossible.| | | | | | 3. Many pupils at the back do not participate much in the lesson.| | | | | | 4. Quiet students often get rejected.| | | | | | 5. Only brilliant students answer questions in class.| | | | | | 6. Teachers questions cannot spread round the class.| | | | | | 7. Teachers movements restricted to the front of the class Because students’ chairs and tables have locked every space.| | | | | | 8. Teachers cannot move around the class to mark students assignment.| | | | | | 9. It is impossible to catch students cheating.| | | | | | 10. Late-comers sneak in unnoticed.| | | | | | 11. It is difficult for teachers to see students who are not paying attention.| | | | | | 12. Truants go unnoticed in the class.| | | | | | 13. Teaching aids cannot go round everybody.| | | | | | Table 3. Please mark how well you think the following statements describe you: | Not at allLike Me| Not muchLike Me| SomewhatLike Me| A lotLike Me| 1. I really want to learn.| | | | | 2. I participate regularly in class.| | | | | 3. I often need extra help with homework.| | | | | 4. I try my best but it doesn’t help me do well.| | | | | 5. I usually bored with what we study in class.| | | | | 6. The topics I am studying in school are Interesting and challenging.| | | | | 7. I can do better work than I’m doing now.| | | | | Thinking of the teachers you have in class, how would you grade them in these areas. | Failing â€Å"F†| Poor â€Å"D†| Fair â€Å"C†| Good â€Å"B†| Excellentâ€Å"A†| 1. Well organized.| | | | | | 2. Communicates clearly.| | | | | | 3. Explains material.| | | | | | 4. Teachers a variety of perspectives.| | | | | | 5. High expectations for all students.| | | | | | 6. Understands subject matters very well.| | | | | | 7. Treat students equally.| | | | | | 8. | | | | | |

Just Clean Your Hands essayEssay Writing Service

Just Clean Your Hands essayEssay Writing Service Just Clean Your Hands essay Just Clean Your Hands essayJust Clean Your Hands is the program that aims at the promotion of cleaning hands by the health care and support staff in the London Health Sciences Center. The program focuses on the health care and support staff, which is supposed to bear the full responsibility for the maintenance of the clean and healthy environment in the clinic. However, the problem is that the London Health Sciences Center still faces the problem of the low hands cleaning rate that puts under a threat the health of health care professionals, support staff and clients of the clinic. Therefore, the introduction of the Just Clean Your Hands program is essential for the clinic to enhance its quality of services delivered to patients and to secure the health care environment from spreading infections and diseases caused by unclean hands or poor hands cleaning culture of the clinic’s staff.Just Clean Your Hands is the program that aims at the maintenance of the healthy environment i n the London Health Sciences Center’s medical and support staff. The maintenance of the healthy environment is crucial for the delivery of efficient health care services. This program focuses on the training of the staff how to clean hands and to develop the culture of cleaning hands among health care professionals and support staff. In such a way, the program will create the healthy environment in the clinic through the training of the staff and developing right habits of cleaning their hands.Otherwise, there is a high risk of the contamination of patients as well as health care professionals and support staff working in the center. Unclean hands of the health care and support staff is one of the major risk factor for inpatients as well as for the staff. Unclean hands are source of danger and high risk of spreading infections and contamination of patients and health care professionals along with the support staff. At the moment, the London Health Sciences Center has the poor hand washing compliant rate. Therefore, the center faced the high risk of spreading infections and disease because of the poor hand washing culture. The poor hand cleaning culture puts under a threat the health of patients and the health care and support staff.Even though there are objective factors that cause the poor hand washing rate, such as the work overload, but the health care and support staff should respect hand washing standards because it is the matter of hygiene and health of the staff and clients. Health care professionals and support staff should be aware of the importance of cleaning hands to secure themselves and patients from numerous threats and risks, which are particularly high in the health care environment, where the staff and patients are constantly exposed to the risk of the contamination and regular and through cleaning of hands is essential to keep the staff and patients from the contamination by some infectious disease or developing other health problems that may be transmitted via unclean hands.In such a situation, the simple cleaning hands will help to reduce the risk of spreading infections and health problems within the clinical environment will be helpful. In addition, cleaning hands helps to protect clients from deteriorating their condition under the impact of infections brought into the clinical environment because of unclean hands. The cleaning of hands does not need many efforts from the part of health care professionals and support staff. They should just clean their hands regularly and throughout and that is what Just Clean Your Hands is trying to teach them. Furthermore, cleaning hands is the simple but cost-efficient method because it allows saving costs of the health care organization because simple measure that cost next to nothing, cleaning hands, can prevent the development of serious health conditions that will require costly and serious treatment.At the same time, it is worth mentioning the fact that often the pr oblem is not the negligence of the health care and support staff that leads to their failure to clean their hands regularly. Instead, the problem often is the wrong hands cleaning technique. In this regard, Just Clean Your Hands program offers the detailed recommendations and training of the staff to clean hands right that improves the quality of hands cleaning and makes it really efficient. As a result, health care professionals and support staff clean their hands effectively and, thus, secure themselves, their colleagues and clients. Therefore, the implementation of the Just Clean Your Hands program will help the health care and support staff of the London Health Sciences Center to resolve the problem of the low hands cleaning rate and improve the health care environment in the clinic.Thus, Just Clean Your Hands is an effective program that has to be implemented into the London Health Sciences Center to improve the hands cleaning culture of the staff and to secure not only the per sonnel of the clinic but also clients.

A Color Purple essays

A Color Purple essays The characters relational identity towards one another in The Color Purple played a significant role in the development of each character. Specifically, the relationships between Celie and the other characters begin to define her and change her throughout the novel. The relationship between Celie and Shug Avery is the focus from early on in the book as well as the relationship between Celie and her sister, Nettie. Once Netties letters are found some of the focus returns back towards Nettie. Celie and Nettie are sisters that are close, with Nettie being the younger one. Early on in the book Nettie serves as a stronger personality than Celie even though Nettie is much younger than her. After marrying Mr. , Celie takes Nettie into her home after Celie runs away from their step father. After some failed sexual advances by Mr. _ towards Nettie, Nettie is forced to leave Celie behind also. This leaves Celie alone with Mr. _ and makes Celie basically powerless. She is essentially seen as someone who is very passive in her confrontations, especially with Mr. _, as well as other men. However, Celie shows she knows that others see her as a powerless object when she tells Sofia, Celies large dominant friend who marries Celies stepson, she is jealous of her strong, self-defensive personality. I like Sofia, but she dont act like me at all. If she talking when Harpo and Mr. _ come in the room she keep right on. Nettie tells Celie that she will write her but eventually the letters get snatched up by Mr. _ and he never tells Celie about them. Celie assumes Nettie is dead because she has not heard from her since she left. One day Shug Avery notices a few letters that Mr. _ has been holding back. With them all being hidden in Mr. _ trunk Celie, with the h elp of Shug Avery, regains her sense of self-identity by learning about her prior fa...